OP-ROB

Film and Television Reviews

  • Reviews
  • Rating System
  • Op-Rob Top 50
  • About

"The Big Short" Review

February 07, 2016 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: LEGEND

“The Big Short” is a film directed by Adam McKay about a few geniuses who decided to “short” the housing market before its infamous crash in 2008. McKay, whose well-known films include “Anchorman”, “Talladega Nights”, “Step Brothers” and “The Other Guys”, utilizes his knack for comedy throughout the film. However, “The Big Short” is serious in its overall scope. The main characters confront real problems and display incredible complexity. The catalyst behind the short was a hedge fund manager named Dr. Michael Burry, who is played by Christian Bale. Burry’s gutsy move prompted a trader named Jared Vennett (Ryan Gosling) and another hedge fund manager named Mark Baum (Steve Carell) to follow in the same direction. Finally, two upstart investors named Jamie Shipley (Finn Wittrock) and Charlie Geller (John Magaro) also shorted the housing market with the help of a more experienced investor named Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt).

Before seeing “The Big Short”, I really had no idea how the housing market worked, or even what it meant to “short” something. The film does an excellent job of explaining these topics as well as more nuanced aspects of the housing market such as the role of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO’s) and AAA mortgage ratings and a slew of other confusing topics. McKay manages to have a ton of fun with the necessary but otherwise boring explanations in the film. For example, there is a scene where Margot Robbie describes subprime loans while sipping champagne in a bubble bath. In another scene Jared Vennett stacks up a tower of Jenga blocks to help Baum's hedge fund visualize the housing market's structure. Regardless of the actual events, this approach is extremely effective and totally unique. It gives "The Big Short" a boost of energy by tackling subjects that could easily bog down the flow of the film and bore the audience.

The story takes place from 2005 to 2008 and another intriguing technique in the "Big Short" is how McKay shows the passing of time. Instead of using inter titles or narration, there are flashes of pop culture videos and sound bites from celebrities to show how the country was changing and kept distracted while the bomb that was the housing market ticked away. This method is entertaining, but also allows McKay to critique another aspect of American culture. One of the opening lines of the film points out that Burry saw the inevitable downfall of the housing market because he did what no one else did, or wanted to do, "he looked". Perhaps the Britney Spears interview and Ludacris rap video exemplify that American culture is such that we'd rather “enjoy the show” than face reality. This goes for the greedy bankers and innocent civilians alike.

Aside from the undeniably amusing and effective style of "The Big Short", the strongest asset of the film can be found in the characters. Christian Bale and Steve Carell turn in moving performances as Michael Burry and Mark Baum. Both men are eccentric and awkward in their own ways, but each also faces personal battles that transcend the initially comical feeling of the film. In all the movies I've seen I have never experienced such polarization in the use of comedy and drama as in "The Big Short”, it is both a laugh-out-loud comedy and a leave-the-theater-in-dead-silence drama.

I've seen the “The Big Short” three times now. The first was with my ideologically and politically conservative parents. The second time I saw it on a date with a wicked smart, super pretty girl. And the third time, I was with some guys from my college fraternity. Three separate experiences, three different kinds of movie companions, but each time I was seeing the same movie. Why am I telling you all of this? Well, I guess what I'm trying to say is that this film is accessible. Its versatility is extremely rare and that is what makes the film so great. Seldom do you come across a well acted, concise, hilarious, moving, and culturally important film that can reach so wide an audience. "Spotlight" is still my movie of the year, but "The Big Short" is the kind of film I'll watch again and again. Re-watchability is something that often comes at the price of depth and "The Big Short" manages to beat the odds.

- S/O to Rex for the recommendation.

February 07, 2016 /Robert Doughty
Comment

"The Revenant" Review

January 16, 2016 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: ALL-STAR

                 "The Revenant" is a film directed Alejandro González Iñárritu about the legendary mountain man Hugh Glass, portrayed by Leonard DiCaprio. In the opening scenes Glass and his son Hawk (Forrest Goodluck) escape an Indian attack with a few members of their hunting party. As arrows fly from every direction, the men load as many animal pelts as possible onto a river boat and push off down the water. As the “scout” for the group, Glass suggests they ditch the boat and move up on land. The captain of the outfit, Andrew Henry (Domhnall Gleeson) supports the decision despite backlash from a brutish hunter named John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy). During the trek, Glass scouts ahead of the others and is surprised by a mama grizzly bear that mauls him beyond recognition. Somehow he survives and is left in the care of his son, Fitzgerald, and a teenager named Jim Bridger (Will Poulter) while the rest of the hunters move on to safety. Fitzgerald quickly gets antsy, and tries to suffocate Glass who seemingly agrees to the idea. However, Hawk interrupts the execution and confronts Fitzgerald who promptly stabs the young man to death while Glass, whose throat has been slashed by the bear, lies on a stretcher completely helpless. Ultimately, Fitzgerald hides Hawk’s corpse and dupes the kind-hearted Bridger into leaving Glass behind by falsely telling him of an impending Indian ambush. The rest of the movie is devoted to Glass and his journey back from being left for dead.

 

            Iñárritu’s style of filmmaking is simply captivating. His signature whip-pan movements and long takes immerse the viewer into the wild. In dynamic scenes such as the one where the hunters are attacked by Indians and shortly after when the bear horrifically mangles Glass, Iñárritu manages to create a sense of omniscience and simultaneously, total clarity. With “The Revenant” Iñárritu has made a film that looks painfully real; the wind and ice seem to bleed through the screen. It is Iñárritu’s first film since "Birdman", which won him Academy Awards for best picture and best director. In many ways, "The Revenant" seems to be the antithesis of "Birdman". This film isn't confined to a city and a dialogue heavy plot; instead the story occurs in a place that seems a million miles from civilization. Every shot reveals nature in its most raw form. From the streams to the trees to the vast mountainous landscapes, "The Revenant" is truly mesmerizing and beautiful.

 

             Despite superb filming, intuitive directing, and powerful acting, “The Revenant” falls short because there simply isn’t much to think about upon the film’s conclusion. While Glass’ journey is intriguing, his motivation to survive culminates in a bleary final scene in which he finds that revenge is in God’s hands and not his own. “The Revenant” is much more of a visual experience than a thought-provoking film. It’s hard to glean any meaning from watching a groaning, bloody pulp of a man crawl his way through the snow for two and half hours. If anything, “The Revenant” succeeds most in presenting the American West as a harsh environment inhabited by even harsher people.

 

          There are a few flashbacks that provide some context for Glass’ identity, but nothing concrete. In truth, very little is revealed about any of the characters. The main villain is John Fitzgerald. Tom Hardy probably didn’t have to spend too much time getting into character because Fitzgerald is equally rambling and incoherent as was Max Rockatansky, who Hardy portrayed this past summer in “Mad Max: Fury Road”. Unlike Max, however, Fitzgerald is singularly selfish and unlikeable. He spends the majority of the film stomping around and grunting racist comments about Indians. Poulter shows more depth as Jim Bridger, who is truly conflicted over leaving Glass out in the wilderness to die, but never gets enough screen time to fully develop. DiCaprio turns in an incredible performance as Glass, but does far more suffering than speaking. 

 

          There is a scene early on in the film where Glass excruciatingly drags himself along the ground gripping handfuls of dirt and snow that scrape against his flayed fingers. After consoling the frozen corpse of his son, Glass manages to crawl into a clearing onto the edge of a cliff revealing a vast and gorgeous valley below. This scene captures the essence of “The Revenant”.In a place dominated by violence and gore there is also tremendous beauty. The film is hard to watch, but there are often moments where you just have to sit back and appreciate the way the camera moves and the striking imagery it reveals. With “The Revenant”, Iñárritu proves his mastery of filmmaking while DiCaprio proves his depth and breadth as an actor. While a lack of narrative and meaning hold “The Revenant” back from greatness, the film overcomes it’s plot deficiencies through outstanding imagery and a masterful display of directing and acting.

 

 

January 16, 2016 /Robert Doughty
1 Comment

"Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens" Review

December 26, 2015 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: STARTER

“Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens” is the latest installment of the “Star Wars” movie franchise conceived by George Lucas. The series opened in 1977 with “Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope”.  Being part of the most famous movie series in film history, “The Force Awakens” has received a considerable amount of hype over the past few years, ever since its official announcement in 2013. The man in charge of living up to this tsunami of expectation is director J.J. Abrams. Fortunately, Abrams is no stranger to this type of pressure, he handled “Mission: Impossible III” in 2006 as well as “Star Trek” and “Star Trek: Into Darkness” in 2009 and 2013, and received critical acclaim for his work with the treasured franchises. With “The Force Awakens”, Abrams has once again employed his ability to craft a blockbuster that appeals to old and new fans alike.

             As the iconic opening credits explain so well, the Galactic Empire has fallen and Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) has disappeared. The power vacuum created by the Empire’s demise has been filled by the equally sinister “First Order”. Combatting the First Order is the “Resistance” led by General Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher). In the opening scene the best fighter pilot in the Resistance, Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac), is on the arid planet of Jakku looking for a map that leads to Luke Skywalker. Dameron finds the map, only to be ambushed by stormtroopers of the First Order.  To ensure the map’s safety, Dameron stores it in his droid, BB-8, who escapes the stormtrooper attack and rolls off into the desert. BB-8 is fortuitously scooped up by a “scrapper” girl named Rey (Daisy Ridley), who quickly learns the droid’s story. Meanwhile, Dameron is taken prisoner by the First Order and interrogated by Kylo Ren (Adam Driver), a dark lord with extraordinary force powers. Ren obtains knowledge of BB-8 from Dameron and informs the First Order of the droids importance.

            In the midst of this opening, Rey emerges as one of two main protagonists, the other being a stormtrooper known as FN-2187 (John Boyega). During the village attack on Jakku, FN-2187 witnesses a fellow stormtrooper and presumably a friend die in thick of the fight. The dying stormtrooper reaches up to FN-2187 and in doing so wipes some blood onto the clean, white helmet. This simple detail marks an otherwise anonymous stormtrooper, and shows a glimpse at actual blood, something rarely seen in the Star Wars universe. In this brief moment of foreshadowing we are introduced to FN-2187, or “Finn”, as he is later known in the film. Finn makes it out of the battle alive, but emotionally disturbed and disillusioned with the First Order. Post-interrogation, Finn breaks Dameron out of the war cruiser and together they steal a “TIE Fighter” which they crash-land back on Jakku. Through a series of events Finn eventually links up with Rey, and their adventure begins.

            Knowing the high-stakes, Abrams doesn’t venture very far off of the battle tested Star Wars formula. Summarily there is a “Death Star”-like threat to the galaxy that must be stopped; Rey and Finn are the main heroes; Kylo Ren is the lead villain. While it is Rey, Finn, and Ren that drive the story’s narrative, there is a slew of supporting characters both new and old. Princess Leia returns as General Leia Organa, Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew) also make substantial contributions to the new adventure. Other characters include General Hux (Domnhall Gleeson) who runs the more technical side of the First Order, much like General Moff Tarkin (Peter Cushing) did in the original trilogy; in addition, the appears the mysterious Supreme Leader Snoke (Andy Serkis) who resembles Emperor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) from both of the older trilogies.

             “The Force Awakens” is a passing of the baton from one era to the next. It pays homage to an older, much beloved series while spreading seeds for the new generation. This strategy keeps the film relevant to both seasoned fans and people seeing “Star Wars” for the first time. It's also what holds “The Force Awakens” back from being truly great. The film is caught in between two visions, and can't live up to either. The older characters are less potent, and the new ones are not well developed. Abrams devotes too many scenes to old characters that don’t necessarily contribute to the story, and wastes dialogue on references to previous films in order to generate laughs or strike a sentimental note. The biggest disappointment of the film is Kylo Ren. I was expecting an intimidating, formidable foe but instead saw a spoiled, insecure, little punk. While I respect Abrams more humanistic approach to creating a villain, Ren just cannot be taken seriously. In more than one scene he reacts to bad news by throwing a hissy fit and slashing up expensive consoles with his fancy lightsaber like a toddler. On the light side, the strongest assets of “The Force Awakens” are both Rey and Finn. Daisy Ridley and John Boyega bring a level of emotion to their respective characters that is seldom seen even in the original trilogy.

               While the film isn't groundbreaking on its own, it certainly shows great promise for the future. Rey and Finn are both extraordinary heroes that I'll look forward to seeing more of. Now that older characters have been dealt with, the story can move on into a world of endless possibilities. While Abrams first Star Wars outing feels a bit stuck in the past, it sets an exciting precedent for subsequent films. 

December 26, 2015 /Robert Doughty
1 Comment
  • Newer
  • Older

Powered by Squarespace