OP-ROB

Film and Television Reviews

  • Reviews
  • Rating System
  • Op-Rob Top 50
  • About

"How to Be Single" Review

February 18, 2016 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: BENCH

 “How to Be Single” is like a multi-season New York City sitcom jam packed into a feature film. Alice, portrayed by Dakota Johnson, is the main character study; but an ensemble cast includes ten other important yuppies.  Alice has just graduated from Wesleyan and broken up with Josh (Nicholas Braun), her boyfriend of four years, in order to experience single life in New York City.  Upon arriving at her new job, Alice befriends Robin (Rebel Wilson), an energetic party girl who knows all about being single in the city.  With the help of Robin, Alice meets Tom (Anders Holm), a bar owner with a die-hard swinger mentality.  They have sex and Tom explains how he handles single life, including a tour of his girlfriend-proof apartment with no breakfast foods and no running water.  Satisfied with her experiment of being single, Alice tries to reconnect with Josh.  Much to her disappointment, Josh has found another girlfriend and even criticizes Alice for her lack of commitment when they graduated.  More hook-ups and plot developments ensue.  Alice meets David (Damon Wayans Jr.), a wealthy developer who has recently been widowed and left with a daughter. Alice and David start going out, but she is pushed away because David cannot confront his grief and is protective of his daughter.  Ultimately, Alice comes to a realization that being happy as a single person is relative, and for her it means fulfillment in moments of absolute stoicism. Adjacent storylines include Lucy (Alison Brie) and Meg (Leslie Mann). Lucy doesn’t want to be single, but cannot find a man that fits her stringent criteria.  Meg is Alice’s older sister who is focused on her career but still wants to have baby.

The main flaw in "How to Be Single" is a severe lack of character development. Most of the people in the movie represent stereotypes rather than intelligent human beings. Tom is the swinger and to him relationships are a waste of time. Lucy is the straight-laced girl who knows exactly what she wants (her character is reminiscent of Monica Geller/Bing from the sitcom "F.R.I.E.N.D.S."). Robin is a rambunctious partier who drinks and does drugs and sleeps around and doesn't care what you think of her (similar to the character portrayed by Amy Schumer in "Trainwreck"). Out of the entire lineup, Alice and David were the only characters that have enough heft to actually care about.

Another major issue with "How to Be Single" is the plot. It doesn't make sense. There are two separate scenes where Meg (Leslie Mann) emphatically breaks up with her boyfriend citing her need to be independent; neither is acknowledged in the slightest by the boyfriend and he just keeps showing up. By the end of the film, three of the main characters have inexplicable changes of heart. In the most shocking example, Josh abandons his "nice-guy" stereotype and makes a purely sexual advance on Alice. The possibility of Josh needed to be eliminated, so his character is hastily warped into a villain. These, and several other scenes feel forced either for the sake of a couple laughs or the structure of the plot.

The misdirection in "How to Be Single" is ultimately the biggest hindrance to the truly relevant characters. David is a compelling person with an interesting backstory, yet he gets maybe 15 minutes of screen time while Robin, an utterly meaningless character receives closer to an hour. A prime example of the writers of "How to Be Single" sacrificing their own creations for a couple jeers comes near the end of the movie in a scene between Tom and Alice. The two are hanging out discussing their relationship woes, when Alice starts counting the number of drinks they have shared. The "drink number" was a bit introduced by Robin earlier in the film where she explains that between two friends, there is a number of drinks that constitutes a definitive sexual encounter. In this scene, Alice frantically counts the beer bottles; she is seemingly adverse to the idea of sex with Tom. Yet Alice counts to the "drink number" and has sex with Tom, a decision she immediately regrets. What are Alice's motivations in this scene? She doesn't have to have sex with Tom. The drink number was a Robin joke, not a rule handed down by God. In this scene the joke is made at the expense of Alice’s character within the movie. But this is a comedy. Why am I fretting over character depth and how realistic the plot is? While "How to Be Single" is labeled as a Romantic Comedy, it makes a concerted effort to be "deep", and the second half of the film is surprisingly somber compared to the first half.

Somewhere hidden in all of the nonsensical scenes that comprise "How to Be Single", there is an attempt to explain how a young woman lives in a post-materialistic society. This is a compelling topic, yet the movie is too distracted and unsure of itself to make provide any concrete answers. "How to Be Single" tries to be a raunchy comedy, a relationship drama, and a philosophical expedition all at the same time. When you break up the movie into each individual storyline, it's easy to see the shallowness of the overall story and the lack of substance within the characters. In the end all that is left is a weak rom-com that wastes its talented cast by not fulfilling any one of its many storylines: it is ironic that a lack of commitment is the downfall of "How to Be Single".

February 18, 2016 /Robert Doughty
Comment

"Deadpool" Review

February 13, 2016 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: ALL-STAR

Quite frankly, Ryan Reynolds hasn't been in too many good movies. He has never been able to land a role that really maximized his strengths. It's ironic that Reynolds' greatest film achievement was called "Buried", in which he was stuck in a box for the duration of the movie. Now, Reynolds finally has gotten his chance with "Deadpool". All of that pent up snark and pizazz has been let loose, and in a Marvel superhero movie of all places. Reynolds stars as Wade Wilson, an ex-special-ops soldier turned mercenary. Wilson's life takes an unexpected turn when he meets Vanessa Carlysle (Morena Baccarin) and they fall in love. However, he is soon diagnosed with terminal cancer and confronted by a shady businessman (Jed Rees) who offers a cure to his cancer.

After initially dismissing him, Wilson accepts the offer and is brought to a ramshackle clinic in a dingy city basement. Quickly, Wilson realizes he has been tricked into taking part in a private experiment to turn humans into mutants. And so, through a gruesome process Wilson's "mutant genes" are brought to life. He becomes incredibly strong and immune to any kind of injury; he heals like Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) in the "X-Men" movies, but much more rapidly. However, the procedure leaves Wilson looking like he has third-degree burns covering his entire body. Wilson breaks out of the prison clinic and decides he can't reunite with Vanessa because, "looks are everything", and he is now ugly. Infuriated by the loss of a future with his girl, Wilson takes on the superhero name "Deadpool" and seeks revenge on the people who made him what he is.

The plot in “Deadpool” isn't all that special: it is a basic revenge story where the hero must confront some inner demons and win back the girl. But "Deadpool" is so much more than just another superhero click added to the Marvel canon. This film is R instead of PG-13. There is bad language, sex scenes, and plenty of blood and gore. This is the MTV of superhero movies. Reynolds totally immerses himself in the character and it is so much fun to watch. One of Deadpool/Wilson’s trademarks in the movie is characterizing everything using drawn out descriptions full of references. In the opening scenes he describes living in a life without love as "two hobos fucking in a shoebox full of piss". That doesn't make sense, but Reynolds delivers each strange qualification with such energy and enthusiasm you just have to shake your head and laugh. In another scene, Deadpool calls Professor Charles Xavier (James McAvoy, Patrick Stewart) a “creepy, bald, Heaven’s Gate-looking motherfucker”. I’m not advocating vulgarity for the sake of vulgarity or gore for the sake of gore, but in “Deadpool” those things contribute to the overarching prank on Hollywood superhero flicks.

Besides the hilarity of the jokes, "Deadpool" is refreshing because it feels more real. Deadpool/Wilson isn't an eccentric billionaire living in a bat-cave or a Malibu mansion, instead he resides in a run down apartment with an elderly, blind, African-American woman named Blind Al (Leslie Uggams). Instead of traveling to fight the bad guys in an X-Jet or a Batmobile, Deadpool has to take a taxicab. Perhaps the greatest irony of Deadpool is the fact that he is gross looking. Superheroes aren't supposed to look like a horror movie monster just like Ryan Reynolds isn't supposed to be able to act without a pretty face.

The director of this unconventional superhero movie is Tim Miller, who is accredited in the opening scene as an "overpaid tool". I would disagree. Before "Deadpool" started I saw six trailers. One was for a franchise produced by J.J. Abrams. The next for a CGI fueled film called "Gods of Egypt", which looks like Gerard Butler cashing in on the last fumes from "300". And the next four were for these movies: "X-Men: Apocalypse", "Captain America: Civil War", "Suicide Squad", and "Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice". Notice anything excessive? I had to laugh a little because after all I was about to see a superhero movie. But "Deadpool" isn't just a movie about a good guy in a costume fighting bad guys. Miller has created a spoof of the superhero fad that is dominating the theaters. And it's not only good in its own right as a superhero origin story; it's uniquely hilarious and entertaining from start to finish. Deadpool might not be able to fly or shoot lasers from his eyes, but at least he has the freedom to call his worst enemy a "wheezing bag of dick tips" and actually watch him bleed. In an America where the next president might be Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump, we need a superhero that speaks his mind and doesn't care; Deadpool is that hero.

February 13, 2016 /Robert Doughty
Comment

"The Big Short" Review

February 07, 2016 by Robert Doughty

OP-ROB RATING: LEGEND

“The Big Short” is a film directed by Adam McKay about a few geniuses who decided to “short” the housing market before its infamous crash in 2008. McKay, whose well-known films include “Anchorman”, “Talladega Nights”, “Step Brothers” and “The Other Guys”, utilizes his knack for comedy throughout the film. However, “The Big Short” is serious in its overall scope. The main characters confront real problems and display incredible complexity. The catalyst behind the short was a hedge fund manager named Dr. Michael Burry, who is played by Christian Bale. Burry’s gutsy move prompted a trader named Jared Vennett (Ryan Gosling) and another hedge fund manager named Mark Baum (Steve Carell) to follow in the same direction. Finally, two upstart investors named Jamie Shipley (Finn Wittrock) and Charlie Geller (John Magaro) also shorted the housing market with the help of a more experienced investor named Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt).

Before seeing “The Big Short”, I really had no idea how the housing market worked, or even what it meant to “short” something. The film does an excellent job of explaining these topics as well as more nuanced aspects of the housing market such as the role of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO’s) and AAA mortgage ratings and a slew of other confusing topics. McKay manages to have a ton of fun with the necessary but otherwise boring explanations in the film. For example, there is a scene where Margot Robbie describes subprime loans while sipping champagne in a bubble bath. In another scene Jared Vennett stacks up a tower of Jenga blocks to help Baum's hedge fund visualize the housing market's structure. Regardless of the actual events, this approach is extremely effective and totally unique. It gives "The Big Short" a boost of energy by tackling subjects that could easily bog down the flow of the film and bore the audience.

The story takes place from 2005 to 2008 and another intriguing technique in the "Big Short" is how McKay shows the passing of time. Instead of using inter titles or narration, there are flashes of pop culture videos and sound bites from celebrities to show how the country was changing and kept distracted while the bomb that was the housing market ticked away. This method is entertaining, but also allows McKay to critique another aspect of American culture. One of the opening lines of the film points out that Burry saw the inevitable downfall of the housing market because he did what no one else did, or wanted to do, "he looked". Perhaps the Britney Spears interview and Ludacris rap video exemplify that American culture is such that we'd rather “enjoy the show” than face reality. This goes for the greedy bankers and innocent civilians alike.

Aside from the undeniably amusing and effective style of "The Big Short", the strongest asset of the film can be found in the characters. Christian Bale and Steve Carell turn in moving performances as Michael Burry and Mark Baum. Both men are eccentric and awkward in their own ways, but each also faces personal battles that transcend the initially comical feeling of the film. In all the movies I've seen I have never experienced such polarization in the use of comedy and drama as in "The Big Short”, it is both a laugh-out-loud comedy and a leave-the-theater-in-dead-silence drama.

I've seen the “The Big Short” three times now. The first was with my ideologically and politically conservative parents. The second time I saw it on a date with a wicked smart, super pretty girl. And the third time, I was with some guys from my college fraternity. Three separate experiences, three different kinds of movie companions, but each time I was seeing the same movie. Why am I telling you all of this? Well, I guess what I'm trying to say is that this film is accessible. Its versatility is extremely rare and that is what makes the film so great. Seldom do you come across a well acted, concise, hilarious, moving, and culturally important film that can reach so wide an audience. "Spotlight" is still my movie of the year, but "The Big Short" is the kind of film I'll watch again and again. Re-watchability is something that often comes at the price of depth and "The Big Short" manages to beat the odds.

- S/O to Rex for the recommendation.

February 07, 2016 /Robert Doughty
Comment
  • Newer
  • Older

Powered by Squarespace